Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.

Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.

How to use this page

[edit]
  1. Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
  2. Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
  3. Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
  4. Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
  5. Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
    1. Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
    2. If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
  6. Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
    1. Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
  7. Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
  8. Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
  9. Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.

Special notes

[edit]

Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.

Discussion for Today

[edit]
This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025_January_12


January 12

[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit]

Category:Suspension bridges in the Falkland Islands

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Single entry; with no other likely. Article can be moved to parent categories. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Kamenický Šenov

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Category with just two entries. Lost in Quebec (talk) 10:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Series of books

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Main article for this category is book series, where series of books redirects. Parent category is Category:Literary series. Child categories include various 'something' series, like Category:Anthology series or Category:Manga series. Seems pretty straightforward. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:50, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Petrosina

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: According to WoRMS, the suborder Petrosina has been abandoned as polyphyletic. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:18th century in Tahiti

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Not useful for navigation. WP:NARROW. Contains only one article which is already categorized under Category:1769 in Oceania. –Aidan721 (talk) 05:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Franklin military family

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: This is the only family category with "military family" at the end. We've been renaming categories of Category:Families by occupation to always put the occupation in parentheses at the end. This seems like it doesn't need to be an exception. Mike Selinker (talk) 05:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1706 murders in Africa

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Not useful for navigation. Merge/delete per WP:NARROW. –Aidan721 (talk) 04:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hart wrestling family books

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: This category is mostly redirects, which I suggest removing from this category, and then upmerging the five remaining articles to Category:Professional wrestling books and either Category:Hart wrestling family or the rename to Category:Hart family (professional wrestling) nominated below. Mike Selinker (talk) 04:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Professional wrestling families

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Per this discussion, which renamed Category:Alvarado wrestling family to Category:Alvarado family (professional wrestling), as well as Category:Gutiérrez family (professional wrestling) and Category:Knight family (professional wrestling). This rename makes it match all other families which require disambiguation by sport and also specifies the type of wrestling. As for Category:Hart wrestling family members, as important as this family is to wrestling, I don't think a separate category is required for its members, as no other wrestling family has such a thing. Mike Selinker (talk) 04:18, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP Puerto Rico redundant categories

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: More redundant categories; all (e.g.) Templates are of NA-importance to WP:WPPR. Delete all of them. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 04:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens women's tennis venues

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NARROWCAT and WP:OVERLAPCAT. Categories contain just 2 articles and 3 redirects. User:Namiba 02:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kardashian family and Category:Jenner family

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: The presence of the category loop and the overlapping contents suggest that the topics are the same. One subcategory in common is Category:Television shows related to the Kardashian–Jenner family. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ōtori taisha

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Category loop that contains only the main article Ōtori taisha (Ōtori-zukuri is a redirect); and Nan'yō Shrine, which does not mention either. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Traitors in history

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: WP:BLPCRIME, people should be in Category:People convicted of treason if they were convicted. Forms a category loop with Category:Defectors. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Muay Thai practitioners

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Why is there only a single article in this category tree? –LaundryPizza03 (d) 01:57, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American Indian Wars

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate category that forms a category loop. The main article is titled American Indian Wars, but the latter matches other subcategories of Category:Wars by peoples involved. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 01:41, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Circum-Caribbean tribes

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: There is no main article about the "Circum-Carribean". Is this a duplicate? They do form a category loop. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 01:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Orders of South Africa

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Intermediate levels with only one article (and in one case, a file). –LaundryPizza03 (d) 01:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vital statistics (government records)

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Redundant categories that form a category loop. I am also proposing to merge their eponymous articles for the same reason. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 01:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]